<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW 3 Series GT Confirmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carsuk.net/bmw-3-series-gt-confirmed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carsuk.net/bmw-3-series-gt-confirmed/</link>
	<description>Car News, Views and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.carsuk.net/bmw-3-series-gt-confirmed/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carsuk.net/?p=6467#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>The X6 is an exlusive rich-man toy which looks gorgeous. 

But the 3 and 5s are mass-market models that fill their respective niches well. 

I don&#039;t see where these strange-looking and nonsensical &#039;GT&#039;s come in . 

And yes, like Carsoblog, I agree too that it&#039;s just strange at best and ugly with all honesty. 

It fits in no segment current, new or conceivable. 

Total waste of marketing and production costs. 

BMW should just shelve this. 

It&#039;s lamer than Renault trying to launch a certain &#039;new&#039; car called the Avantime. 

At least that was truly ground breaking ,this , on the other hand, has no point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X6 is an exlusive rich-man toy which looks gorgeous. </p>
<p>But the 3 and 5s are mass-market models that fill their respective niches well. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where these strange-looking and nonsensical &#8216;GT&#8217;s come in . </p>
<p>And yes, like Carsoblog, I agree too that it&#8217;s just strange at best and ugly with all honesty. </p>
<p>It fits in no segment current, new or conceivable. </p>
<p>Total waste of marketing and production costs. </p>
<p>BMW should just shelve this. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s lamer than Renault trying to launch a certain &#8216;new&#8217; car called the Avantime. </p>
<p>At least that was truly ground breaking ,this , on the other hand, has no point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsoblog</title>
		<link>http://www.carsuk.net/bmw-3-series-gt-confirmed/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsoblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carsuk.net/?p=6467#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the connection of GT (Grand Tourismo) and this flat &quot;estate&quot;  version. Cmon... I know that diversity in versions is important, but these are awful (3 and 5 and X6). They all look like cockroaches.
Maybe next step will be GT cabrio? SUV GT? let&#039;s mix the segments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the connection of GT (Grand Tourismo) and this flat &#8220;estate&#8221;  version. Cmon&#8230; I know that diversity in versions is important, but these are awful (3 and 5 and X6). They all look like cockroaches.<br />
Maybe next step will be GT cabrio? SUV GT? let&#8217;s mix the segments <img src='http://www.carsuk.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
